Registration Numbers Growing
When the 12,000 expected athletes and
cultural participants take to the streets, pools, and fields
of Chicago next summer -- beginning with the opening
ceremonies at Soldier Field, home of the Chicago Bears -- it
will be to celebrate the seventh edition of the FGG’s Gay
Games.
|
Gay
Games I |
San
Francisco |
1982 |
1,350 |
|
Gay
Games II |
San
Francisco |
1986 |
3,500 |
|
Gay
Games III |
Vancouver |
1990 |
7,300 |
|
Gay
Games IV |
New
York |
1994 |
12,500 |
|
Gay
Games V |
Amsterdam |
1998 |
13,000 |
|
Gay
Games VI |
Sydney |
2002 |
11,000 |
|
Gay
Games VII |
Chicago |
2006 |
12,000 (estimated) |
As
of late July, the number of registrants for the Gay Games
stood at almost 3,000.
A major component of both groups’ marketing
plan has been the execution of registration drives. Asked
about the status of current registration efforts, Boyer said
that they were still expecting “12,000 to 13,000 [athletes
and artists] and we’re absolutely on target.” A worldwide
registration drive was launched in May that included parties
in major cities around the U.S. and the rest of the world.
The
number of paid registrants for Montreal’s Outgames stood at
6,500 in late August, and GLISA’s Rachel Corbett said these
registrants come from 87 different countries.
Even with only 3,000
registrants, the FGG and CGI organizers maintain they are
unconcerned about their registration goals and it remains
unclear whether the turnout for next summer’s games will be
split on nationalistic lines. Gene Dermody, a sports and
technology co-chair for FGG, said the numbers would pick up
in coming months and that the timeline for American
registration, which has always been about 40% of any Gay
Games total, was largely determined by travel and housing
arrangements. “In Sydney, you had to make your reservations
a year and a half out. … In the U.S., Americans don’t have
to do that to get to Chicago, a major airline hub,” he said.
European participation has tended to
fluctuate a lot in the past depending on how close the Games
are held to the European continent. Next summer, the reasons
for higher or lower European participation may be even more
complicated. “The thing that upsets me is the blatant
anti-Americanism out there,” Dermody said, referring to the
foreign reactions to the administration and to the United
States’ general stance on gay marriage.
Dermody, a former FGG president, has also
been a member of the San Francisco athlete delegation,
called Team San Francisco, since 1986. He said Team S.F. and
the Bay Area always bring from 1,000 to 1,100 participants
to any Gay Games. Though he informally estimates that there
are about 200 registered to date for the Chicago Games, he
said there was no big pressure to get people registered now
and that at least 800 to 900 more would begin to register in
the coming months.
“We will have some people who will go to both
Chicago and Montreal,” Dermody said, “Though most will
choose Chicago.” He cited several reasons for why athletes
might participate in both games. “IGLA [International Gay &
Lesbian Aquatics] is a big supporter of the Gay Games” he
said, for example, but some San Francisco swimmers will also
go to Montreal on their own because there will be a new
synchronized swimming event not offered in Chicago.
In contrast, Dermody said that he knows
German wrestlers who will only get subsidies to attend the
Outgames in Montreal. California wrestlers, on the other
hand, can only expect bulk airline and hotel vouchers for
Chicago. Dermody said that these are the difficult choices
made by each local sports organization and driven by the
finances of large group discounts, not politics.
A Year To Go
With less than 12 months until the Gay Games,
Chicago’s local government, financial sponsors, and athletes
are defying any concern about CGI’s ability to organize the
Gay Games under the restrictions of a shortened timeline.
“The Chicago LGBT communities are rallying
around the event,” said Bill Greaves, the City of Chicago
Liaison to the LGBT communities of Chicago. “Mayor Daley is
thrilled the Gay Games are coming to Chicago. He’s the
honorary Chair.”
In the 17 months since
Chicago was selected, The City of Chicago and CGI have built
a private/public relationship based on a model that the city
has tested on other projects, such as Millenium Park, a
multi-use public space that includes a concert venue,
dining, art, and an ice rink. Greaves sees this cooperation
as an advantage for the Gay Games because it allows the city
to be a close partner in the games. But he stresses that the
city is “not a financial sponsor and we are not responsible
for the finances of the Games.”
Dermody has a veteran’s perspective and has
seen the organization of the Gay Games over the years,
including Games that almost fell apart at the last minute.
He said that Chicago’s preparations have been more in line
with those of the 1994 Gay Games in New York, which he views
as the most well-organized ever. Speaking of CGI, Dermody
said, “They are professional, mainstream people who are
pro-sports… . The professionalism has never been better than
it was in New York.” And now, after three site visits,
Dermody says, “I’m not the slightest bit worried about their
ability to pull this off.”
The Montreal organizers also have benefited
heavily from government support, and on a much larger scale
than Chicago. Czerniecki said that,
for Montreal, the Outgames will be “second in magnitude only
to the ’76 Montreal Olympics,” adding that he expects 16,000
participants and 250,000 visitors to the city.
As for the execution of the Outgames,
Czerniecki said that all registration and marketing efforts
were on track and that, while the final year of preparation
would see an increase in activity, everything was on or
ahead of schedule. “Three levels of government, community
involvement and private corporate sponsorship… an entire
city working hand in hand to make the first world Outgames the
international event of 2006,” he said.
What
About The Athletes?
With all the fuss over the initial split and
the resulting bitterness, it has been difficult to remember
that what is at stake is not just winning a spitting match,
but rather the experience of thousands of athletes, most of
whom are far removed from the political bickering that has
consumed much of the attention over the last three years.
Dermody, a longtime wrestler, said, “The whole thing is
being escalated by people who have nothing to do with
sports.”
So where do the athletes say their headed
next summer?
David (who asked that his last name not be
used) is a member of Metro Wrestling, a gay New York
wrestling organization that was founded in 1992. Asked if he
had a bias toward a particular event next summer, David said
he was “trying to get funds to go to both” but thought he
would ultimately have a work conflict. David noted that many
of the Metro Wrestlers would end up in Chicago because that
is where the wrestlers from Team San Francisco, their major
rivals, would be competing. He added that the team also had
friends in Montreal who they could stay with if it does work
out to attend both events. “They [his teammates] don’t
really care. They just like competing.”
“I’m supporting my members,” said Christian
West, president of the Team New York, an organization of
LGBT sports groups in New York City, which he called
“neutral.”
“I’m trying to get them to whatever event
they want to go to.” West, who was a founding member of
GLISA, has since taken a step away from the Chicago-Montreal
conflict, calling the personal attacks that followed
Montreal’s split with the FGG “tiring.” West said that there
was no noticeable split within Team New York members and
that their decision of where to compete next summer will be
based more on other factors, such as convenience, trip
expenses, and the ability to take vacation time from work.
Registration fees for both events are higher
than previous Gay Games, ranging from about $200-$400
dollars depending on how many events and what type of events
a participant registers for. And because the events fall
only a week apart, working people who want to compete in
both events will have either to take a full three weeks of
vacation or take two weeks off with only one awkward work
week and extra travel in between.
While some athletes are neutral, others feel
very strongly about their reasons for choosing one event
over the other.
Ozier has an outspoken loyalty to the Gay
Games and said he will compete at swimming in Chicago, as he
did in Sydney and in previous Games. Ozier was living in San
Francisco in the ’80s when the Gay Games and FGG were
founded by Tom Waddle. “The growth they’ve gone through is
spectacular.”
Jeff Kagan, leader of the New York City Gay
Hockey Association, said that he plans to attend both the
Chicago and Montreal events. While he suggested that several
other New York players would do the same, he said they had
not yet voted and made no indication that they would endorse
one event over the other.
“NYCGHA hasn't made any decisions about which
we're going to participate in. We will probably poll our
players sometime this summer.” Kagan said. “I'd much rather
see all of the gay hockey teams together in one city,
sharing the same experience. I don't think they see the big
picture here,” he said, referring to the organizers of the
Gay Games and Outgames, “that they're doing more harm than
good for our community.”
Charlie
Carson, an individual director on the Federation of Gay
Games board and a member of the Host Advisory Board,
said that some people will go to both events
and that he is optimistic that the split hasn’t turned off
athletes to the Games. “I think most people expect there not
to be two large-scale events in the same year in the future
and realized this was just the unfortunate consequence of
two groups failing to come to contractual agreement --
thinking people understand that that sometimes happens. The
people turned off are in a decided minority.”
Replying to an invitation to comment posted
on the Outsports discussion board, Chicago resident and
softball pitcher Bobby Hoeppner wrote in an e-mail: “Even
if I didn't live in Chicago, the obvious choice (if I
couldn't go to both) would be to attend Chicago. It is THE
GAY GAMES and not a new start-up event. I am focused more
on the 'sport' aspect and less on the cultural and party
side - which clearly is a big focus for Montreal. I
believe, for the most part, that the people that are truly
motivated and interested in the 'sport' side want to go with
tradition and the real thing - take no chances with a new
event. The Gay Games are rich with tradition and personal
experiences that many have already experienced (or heard
about) at least once, they want to repeat this.”
The notion that Montreal has been sidetracked
by party planning is unfounded, though some
of the most bitter criticism of Montreal 2006 has come from
Gay Games loyalists who say Montreal is focusing too much on
the celebration and parties and not enough on the sport.
Parties, a major attraction of past Gay Games, have proven
to be losing financial ventures for host committees. But
GLISA’s Corbett says the Outgames organizers have
sub-contracted out all of the parties so that they have no
financial stake in them.
“We will take no financial risk with the
parties,” Corbett said, noting that Chicago was doing the
same this time around. “We’re not experts in parties, we are
experts in sport.” She did acknowledge, however, that the
Outgames stand to benefit from the atmosphere that these
parties create, as will Chicago with the parties there.
FGG’s Dermody warned the parties need to be
kept in check. “The thing we have to watch out for is how
much we can keep control of the cultural component,” he
said. “It gets out of hand.”
2009 and Beyond
After next summer’s inaugural Outgames, GLISA
says it plans to host a second event in 2009 in Copenhagen,
Denmark, offsetting its quadrennial schedule with the FGG by
a year. The decision to switch to odd years was made for a
number of reasons, said Corbett. As GLISA looks to
incorporate itself into the mainstream international sports
calendar, it sees 2009 as a relatively quiet year, falling a
year after the 2008 Summer Olympics and before the 2010
Winter Olympics. Corbett said that this makes available more
corporate sponsorship money in 2009, which becomes tied up
faster during Olympic years.
At an International Board of Directors’
meeting in November in Chicago, the FGG will vote on the
host of Gay Games VIII in 2010. “We will be selecting from
among three well-prepared city groups,” said Charlie Carson.
The candidate cities are: Cologne, Germany; Johannesburg,
South Africa; and Paris.
The Future of the LGBT Sports Movement
The turmoil of the last few years has left
many wondering where the Gay Games and Outgames will be in
10 years, and has even left some questioning the purpose of
such events. For now, and likely until both events are
complete next summer, consensus over whether there ought to
be one or two international multi-sport LGBT events seems a
distant reality.
“If both events are successful it’d be great
to have two big events,” said West of Team New York.
“It’d be great if we could go every two years
… 2006 is not an ideal situation,” said Corbett, suggesting
that the Gay Games and Outgames come to an agreement to
stagger their events and schedule them around the mainstream
sports calendar. She noted that having the separate major
events spaced two years apart would help the local sporting
organizations, which now must keep athletes engaged in
events for four years between the main competitions.
Each sport typically holds its own annual
championship, but many sports organizations originally were
created because of the Gay Games and their competition
schedule treats the Gay Games as the pinnacle event. “For
the local teams it’s hard to keep going for four years,”
Corbett said. This is true in many sports, though team
sports in major cities thrive from year to year with their
interleague competitions and championship events, making
them less dependent on the excitement built around the Gay
Games.
“Historically Tom Waddel brought about the
Gay Games and there is no denying the fact that historically
the Gay Games were an important step in the development of
the LGBT sporting movement,” said Czerniecki. “Is the FGG
still pertinent today? …The LGBT sporting community
worldwide will in time determine what is or isn’t
pertinent. Quality and vision and funding will be the
determining factors.
“Is there room for two major events -- I
certainly believe so. GLISA and the FGG are not pursuing
the same objectives and do not operate in the same manner. I
would go as far as saying that the presence of friendly
competition at certain levels between the two organization
will guaranty a better future and development for the LGBT
sporting movement overall. No one can pretend to ‘own’ the
LGBT movement.
“In my personal opinion [the Gay Games] have
definitely lost some of their luster. Will they bounce back?
Will they reform? …Some good people are trying to make it
work.” Czerniecki added, “Time will tell.”
And that seems to be the general, and perhaps
only, consensus between people familiar with the 2006
events.
David Secter, speaking on a panel at the
NewFest Film Festival in New York in June, where his Gay
Games documentary Take the Flame! was debuting said:
“The proof will be in the pudding.”
Discuss this article
Sept. 8, 2005