France’s Amelie Mauresmo has
long been defined by her heart. Seven years ago, Mauresmo
dramatically burst onto the women’s tennis scene with a
stunning run to the championship match of the 1999
Australian Open as an unseeded, unheralded 19-year-old. Her
path to the title bout included an upset of then top-ranked
Lindsay Davenport in the semifinals, but worldwide media
paid little attention to the quality of Mauresmo’s tennis at
the time, choosing to overlook her on-court accomplishments
in favor of her personal life. The young Frenchwoman who was
taking Australia by storm was also openly gay.
Adding fuel to the media’s unnecessary fascination with
Mauresmo’s sexuality was her final round opponent and
eventual conqueror, Martina Hingis, who infamously gave an
interview in German proclaiming that Amelie Mauresmo was
“half a man.” News stories embellished the tasteless comment
with exaggerated accounts of Amelie’s muscular physique,
broad shoulders, and powerful topspin groundstrokes.
In hindsight, the buzz surrounding Amelie’s athleticism and
style is transparent and laughable. Women with more
powerful, more penetrating ground games have since dominated
women’s tennis. Several top players now dwarf Mauresmo in
both stature and power. Nonetheless, at the time, the sudden
attention would be too much for the teenage Mauresmo.
She struggled with greater
expectations and an intense spotlight that was focused on
her life off the court; it was a glaring attention with
which her developing game was not ready to keep pace.
Mauresmo was forced to wear the tag of “the lesbian player”
while she learned to reign in her wide array of talents.
Seven long years would pass before she returned to another
Grand Slam final; however, the unassuming honesty and
conviction of heart that first grabbed the world’s attention
would foreshadow the type of champion that Amelie Mauresmo
was destined to become.
The 2006 Australian Open
began in typical fashion for the year’s first major tennis
championship. Players enter the fray with precious little
preparation and chaos often ensues, although 10th-seeded
Venus Williams looked impervious to such peril during the
first set of her opening match against Bulgaria’s Tszvetana
Pironkova. Venus was in full flight in posting a
routine 6-2 score line, only to suddenly lose the timing on
her forehand during the second set. The opportunistic
Pironkova quickly shook off her nerves and took advantage,
drubbing Williams 6-0 to even the match. The third set was a
battle of wills, with Venus fighting hard to overcome both
herself and the Bulgarian’s dogged defiance. Pironkova
tenaciously fought her way to a 5-3 lead, but Williams
steadied her resources and broke back to pull even. The
respite would prove short-lived, unfortunately, as Pironkova
-- a player without a sponsor’s endorsement who was clad in
mismatched Reebok and Adidas clothing -- sent a warning to
every top player in the tournament by ousting the reigning
Wimbledon champion 9-7 in the deciding set.
More surprise results would soon follow, including the
dismissal of Venus’ younger sister and the tournament’s
defending champion, Serena Williams. Serena arrived at the
Australian Open to a cacophonous flurry of tabloid attention
that centered on her increased weight. The unflattering buzz
was relentless and often times rude, but there was some
truth at its core, and Serena’s lack of fitness was evident
in her third-round loss to the very dangerous Daniela
Hantuchova.
Upsets were not limited to the women’s draw. Already
depleted by the withdrawals of defending champion Marat
Safin, French Open king Rafael Nadal, and popular veteran
Andre Agassi, the men’s event lost several contenders in the
early rounds. Australia’s own Lleyton Hewitt was
unceremoniously sent packing by Argentine nemesis Juan
Ignacio Chela in the second round, but no one was prepared
for the parade of upsets that was about to unfold at the
hands of 54th-ranked Cypriot Marcos Baghdatis. Baghdatis
began his dream run mildly enough in taking out the No. 17
seed, Radek Stephanek, but he would not be satisfied with
claiming a mere Top 20 scalp. Cheered on by an attractive
Greek chorus of raucous fans as he advanced, Baghdatis
turned the tournament upside down in easily defeating
second-seeded Andy Roddick, the hard-serving American who
was favored to make the final; ending the career-best Grand
Slam run of number seven, Ivan Ljubicic, in the
quarterfinals; and shocking the fourth seed and reigning
year-end champion, Argentina’s David Nalbandian, in the
semifinals.
Baghdatis notched each victory with brilliant tennis and a
smile spread wide across his face, reminiscent of another
smiling assassin who made her return to Grand Slam glory
after a three-year absence from the WTA Tour. Three-time
champion Martina Hingis returned to the site of her first
major win and looked as if she had never left the game. Her
tennis was crisp, nostalgic, and a joy to witness in an era
defined largely by power.
The crafty former world No. 1
thoughtfully outmaneuvered opponents right through to the
quarterfinals, where she challenged the woman who is now
atop the rankings – Kim Clijsters – to a thrilling three-set
match that saw Hingis dismissed in a tight third set. In her
previous incarnation, Hingis was a spoiled player who could
not cope with the increase in power that pushed her off the
professional tour. Older and wiser now, the same woman who
once branded Amelie Mauresmo “half a man” is playing with an
obvious love for the game and its highest levels of
competition, offering testament to the forgotten virtues of
point construction and guile. Hingis’s return to her winning
ways was not limited to singles competition, either. She won
the mixed doubles event with partner Mahesh Bhupati.
Elite champions were dismissed early and often to ask
questions that only they can answer. Yet their post-match
interviews and actions may provide a clue as to the future
of their tennis: Andy Roddick, unable to get a last-minute
wild card into the main draw of a small tour event in Delray
Beach, dropped his sometimes enormous ego and has committed
to playing in the tournament’s qualifying rounds in order to
find his game and confidence; Serena Williams admirably
admitted to not being fit enough and withdrew from an
upcoming event in Tokyo, promising to get back into shape
and return to competitive form; Lleyton Hewitt petulantly
blamed the speed of the court and publicly questioned why
tournament organizers would not make the surface more
friendly to Australian players who generally prefer a faster
court, ludicrously stating that the Rebound Ace “may be
slower than the French Open”; and Venus Williams betrayed
more self-doubt than intended when she branded reporters
“naysayers” with false bravado, concluding her press
conference with a defiant, “I don’t care.”
Meanwhile, to absolutely no one’s surprise, another Swiss
stylist was making his way through the men’s field.
Top-ranked Roger Federer continued his mastery of the ATP
Tour as he advanced through the draw. He was not without
willing challengers, such as the dangerous German Tommy Haas
and deceptively inconspicuous fifth-seed Nikolay Davydenko;
both men were able to push Federer to produce his finest
shots before ultimately succumbing to the tennis genius.
As the second week of competition dawned, the International
Tennis Hall of Fame announced a pair of somewhat
controversial nominees for its Class of 2006. Aussie icon
Patrick Rafter and Argentine beauty Gabriela Sabatini were
met with mixed reaction from tennis fans. The pair of former
U.S. Open champions hold resumes that are impressive but
perhaps not excellent enough to stand alone as proof of
their place in tennis history; however, Rafter and Sabatini
are two of the most humble, sporting, and affable champions
in recent memory. They are heroes whose careers pay homage
to the fact that there is more to being a champion than
simply winning titles, soaring into the company of the
tennis elite on the wings of their talent and the strength
of their character. The announcement would prove oddly
fitting, for as the final stages of the Australian Open
approached, it became clear that the year’s first major was
out to test the true character of the men and women seeking
to conquer the land Down Under.
Nikolas Kiefer was quick to fail the test. The quirky and
dramatic German advanced to his first career Grand Slam
semifinal, but tainted the accomplishment with an idiotic
display of poor sportsmanship in his quarterfinal victory
over France’s Sebastien Grosjean. The two men were deeply
embroiled in the longest match of the tournament when,
during an exchange that saw both men at net, Kiefer
purposely tossed his racquet towards Grosjean. The juvenile
stunt distracted Grosjean and he missed a routine volley,
but the chair umpire incorrectly ruled that the racquet was
tossed after Sebastien had flubbed the shot.
Kiefer shrugged his shoulders
and played innocent at the time, but later admitted that he
knew the point should have been awarded to Grosjean.
Although the match did not turn on that isolated point,
Kiefer’s lack of integrity turned the collective stomach of
tennis fans worldwide. His semifinal defeat at the hands of
Roger Federer was roundly applauded.
The only obstacle remaining in Federer’s quest for a second
Australian Open title was tournament wunderkind Baghdatis
and, for two sets of gripping tennis, the man from the tiny
island of Cyprus looked as if he could cap his feel-good
success story with the most unfathomable victory in tennis
history. Playing with unfettered confidence, Baghdatis was
the first man to break serve in the match and – despite
losing his own serve immediately afterwards – used the
momentum to claim the first set 7-5. The second set was also
closely contested.
Baghdatis was serving down
5-6 to get into a tiebreak, but he hit a forehand long on
break point; the shot was ruled good by the linesman but the
chair umpire immediately overruled and awarded the set to
Federer. Although the call was correct, it seemed to deflate
the jubilant Baghdatis. Federer would claim his third
consecutive Grand Slam title and seventh Slam overall with a
5-7, 7-5, 6-0, 6-2 win. Federer is now halfway to equaling
Pete Sampras’s record tally of 14 major victories and shows
no signs of slowing down. Such an impressive haul of titles
speaks for itself, yet Roger Federer displayed the true
capacity of a champion’s heart when accepting the Norman
Brookes Challenge Cup from Australia’s Rod Laver inside the
arena that bears his name.
“You have no idea how much this means to me,” Federer told
the savvy Australian crowd as he broke into tears in
acknowledging the win itself and the honor of accepting the
trophy from a living legend.
Which brings us back to Mauresmo, now having finally
traversed her record-setting seven-year gap between Grand
Slam finals, and still being defined by her heart. Gone was
the intense focus on her sexuality, but it was replaced by a
questioning of her fragile emotions.
In the interim between
major finals, Mauresmo had more often than not succumbed to
nerves during her biggest moments. Her heart had not caught
up to her talent. Playing into form over the course of the
tournament’s fortnight, Mauresmo was poised and impressive –
particularly in scoring decisive wins over up-and-comer
Nicole Vaidisova and the treacherously talented Patty
Schnyder – but her road to the final was unusual. Mauresmo’s
third round match against promising Michaella Krajicek ended
abruptly when Krajicek retired after losing the first set
handily. Later, during her biggest challenge of the entire
two weeks, Mauresmo was taking charge of a closely contested
match against U.S. Open champion Clijsters when Kim turned
her ankle midway through the third set. Mauresmo clearly had
the momentum, smacking a scorching backhand winner to break
Clijsters and take a 3-2 lead on what would turn out to be
the second-to-last point of the match; however, Amelie had
advanced to the final without having to prove her mettle at
the would-be climax of her semifinal. Questions surrounding
Mauresmo’s nerves were left unanswered as she advanced to
face French Open titleholder Justine Henin-Hardenne.
The women’s championship should have been a battle royal
between the two most artistic all-court players in women’s
tennis, but the contest never lived up to its destiny. A
focused Mauresmo stormed through the first set, befuddling a
stunned Henin-Hardenne with a clever mix of heavy topspin
that took advantage of the rubbery Rebound Ace and forced
Justine beyond the baseline. Henin-Hardenne flailed in
attempting ill-timed winners and Mauresmo took the opener
6-1. She was now but a precious set away from fulfilling the
dream that she had never lost sight of through the ups and
downs of the past seven years. For her part, Justine seemed
to be ready to change tactics and give Mauresmo more of a
fight in the early stages of the second set. Henin-Hardenne
attacked the net with more purpose, but Amelie was resilient
and took a 2-0 advantage. That’s when Justine Henin-Hardenne
failed the Australian Open’s test of her character.
Henin-Hardenne called for the trainer, who arrived carrying
medication to soothe acid reflux, an extremely mild
condition at best. Fans, commentators, and – most notably –
Mauresmo were therefore caught off guard when Henin-Hardenne
announced that she would not continue the match. Mauresmo
was a Grand Slam champion at last, but she had been
short-changed by one of the most selfish and childish stunts
in women’s tennis history.
Justine played brilliantly throughout the Australian Open
fortnight, advancing to the final on the strength of
impressive wins over top-seeded Lindsay Davenport and world
number four, Maria Sharapova. Henin-Hardenne had promised to
fight to capture another “very special” Grand Slam title,
but when questioned about her sudden withdrawal after the
match, she offered a litany of excuses that did not add up.
Justine claimed to have eaten
some seafood a few days prior and to have suffered from
stomach pains ever since. She did not know that ESPN
commentator Mary Jo Fernandez had spoken to the tournament
trainer and been told that the stomach trouble was in no way
related to Henin-Hardenne’s earlier meal. Justine also
professed fear of further injuring a pre-existing sore
shoulder, but prior to the final, Henin-Hardenne publicly
proclaimed that she was completely healthy and felt better
than she had in the last two years. Sad and unprofessional,
Justine Henin-Hardenne’s withdrawal lost any hope for
sympathy when a reporter asked her if she felt sorry that
Mauresmo’s moment of victory had been so abruptly taken
away.
“First,” Henin-Hardenne tellingly bemoaned, “I feel sorry
for myself.”
Amelie Mauresmo was robbed of a celebration overdue in
coming, but she did not let Henin-Hardenne define her
championship.
“The joy is still there,” Mauresmo softly and eloquently
stated. Over the course of her championship run, Amelie
Mauresmo encountered three players who were unable to
compete fully. Michaella Krajicek announced to the press how
touched she was by Mauresmo’s kindness after their match,
because Mauresmo had sought the young girl out in the locker
room to see if she was feeling better after receiving
treatment for heat exhaustion. At the close of her semifinal
with Clijsters, television cameras focused on the two women
as they exchanged the customary handshake at net, and
Mauresmo’s genuine concern for her injured opponent was
evident. Most tellingly, as tournament officials scrambled
to prepare for the trophy presentation, Amelie Mauresmo was
sitting at Justine Henin-Hardenne’s side, consoling the
woman who had stolen her glory only moments before.
Roger Federer’s tears and Amelie Mauresmo’s grace perfectly
illustrate that character in tennis champions does matter.
Sportsmanship and class are palpable, tangible, and obvious
when properly practiced. Thusly, as the Daphne Akhurst
Memorial Cup was finally presented to a beaming Amelie
Mauresmo, its shiny surface mirrored the radiant smile of
the truest brand of champion.
Wyman Meers is a writer living
in New York. He is
Gaga4Gaby on the Outsports Discussion Board.